I'll tell you how your nervous system works; you introduce me to people who can pass it on.

Our research paper Sensory Metrics of Neuromechanical Trust has now been published by the Journal of Neural Computation

I can be reached by real mail at PO Box 872 Menlo Park 94025, or by email at myfirstname@mylastname.com.
I seldom pay attention to Facebook or Twitter; I much prefer real life.
It documents the worldwide epidemic of "screen addiction" and other digital dependencies, it explains them in terms of informational appetites (like cats watching laser-pointers), and it offers multiple real-life routes to therapy.
My first-draft, first-order "Grand Unified Theory of Life" is contained in this short, weirdly informal paper (which for undisclosed reasons ArXiv refused to post), "9.5 Hypotheses on the Informational Structure of Life which are Human- readable, Provocative, Coherent, Plausible, Falsifiable, and Actionable". Here they are:
  • H1. Selection as a process must veer between focus and blur
  • H2. Homeostasis is both fragile and explosive
  • H3. Making sense of space needs microtiming, and is therefore brittle
  • H4. When in doubt, ping!
  • H5: An accelerating epidemic of digital fracturing
  • H6. Community containers recalibrate and cure
  • H7: "Paleo everything but violence" rebalances entropy
  • H8: Reviving Human Resonance
  • H9. Ecstatic breath and spinal straightening
This site may be freely copied and mirrored, subject to the following copyright restrictions:
  • The site (except for "Home Pages") is mirrored in its entirety.
  • A last-synchronization timestamp is visible on the top of the first page.
  • Two paper copies of the current text portions are kept for physical/analog backup.

A Minimally-biased Philosophy of Life

I believe in human happiness as a biophysical principle and a personal goal, both at once.

You can read my thoughts on topics of the day at the Medium.com site "Organic Bandwidth." That has my best and most readable writing. Below, on the other hand, you will find earnest scientific descriptions.

My training is as a theoretical biophysicist (son of two physicists), so of course my personal "philosophy" of life will look like a theory, rather than like a series of personal observations. In this case my theory encompasses not only human happiness but vertebrate happiness, and the vertebrate bio-mechanics that must be based on. I mean this theory to be defensible as scientific truth, but labeling it a "philosophy of life" releases me from defending every little bit at the standards of whatever discipline contests it. Structurally, a simple theory has several enormous advantages over any kind of observations or experiments: it is more trustworthy (being based on incontrovertible principles), its scope is broader, and it is easier and quicker to apply when you need it.

The problem with most theories and philosophies of life is that they are transmitted by culture, and thus include cultural biases. My approach hopes to avoid that pitfall by basing itself not even on experimental science (whose results can be biased by funding preferences or cultural prohibitions), but on essential mathematical principles. Hopefully, those carry very little bias, so their results ought to apply to anyone at any time. Hence "a minimally biased philosopy of life."

I have spent my life designing electronic information-processing circuits and researching neural ones. The most effective circuits of both types are always autonomous and operate on simple principles, meaning they identify their informational needs and pursue them freely. In other words, they pursue "desires" in search of "happiness." Unfortunately, most humans I know and know about do not feel that freedom and thus feel less happy than they might, although in principle anyone could at any moment open her eyes and feel complete.

Our ancestors evolved as upright mammals in a complex world, and whatever happiness-circuitry they used to find their way in life still lies latent in us now. But much of that circuitry has been cloaked or redirected toward the goals of civilized society, and its function has been forgotten. This site aims to clarify the common-sense principles by which our own minds operate, so individuals may rediscover their own humanity inside themselves.

A world of ten billion people for whom fulfillment is but an eye-blink away is unstable (in a good way!), presenting an opportunity for sudden, radical improvement. In a pot of still-molten sugar, adding a single grain can crystallize it all at once. In the same fashion, inside a confused brain or a society, a single shift of viewpoint (or "reference frame") can suddenly recrystallize both perception and performance. The separate "theoretical" viewpoints assembled here are well-established, and in hindsight most seem obvious. That clarity may help this approach spread like wildfire, as useful scientific ideas often spread. But unlike other scientific truths, an understanding of the circuitry which lies inside our minds needs neither external validation (besides experiments on oneself), nor resources (besides those hours spent), nor institutional support. It can only be consumed and spread by individuals for private ends.

These ideas are helping my friends, my family, and myself. I hope that you find similar success.

Slice / lens
Open Questions
Kundalini Experiences
Organic Bandwidth Manifesto
Testable predictions
How To Help

About the site
Theory structure
Theory Communication
Site structure
Site policies

Criscillia Benford's Home Page

pre-2015 Softky Home Page